Rank Risk Index - Desktop Version
December 2017
Maccabee Update
Unconfirmed UpdateDecember 20, 2017
On December 20th, the
Rank Risk Index tracked a significant increase in rank fluctuations. The update was a one day algorithmic event on desktop, where fluctuation levels went as high as 71 on the scale. Mobile saw a two day roll-out that began on the 19th with moderate increases in fluctuation levels. However, on the 20th, those levels rose significantly on mobile as a fluctuation level of 75 was recorded on the index.
This came on the heels of industry chatter that there was an update a few days prior to the one tracked on the 20th. Barry Schwartz of SERoundtable dubbed the December update, the
Maccabee update. Google confirmed that they did release "several minor improvements during this time frame.”
Rank Risk Index - Desktop Version
November 2017
Mid-November Significant Google Update
Unconfirmed UpdateNovember 15, 2017
On November 14th the desktop
Rank Risk Index started tracking increased rank fluctuations. By November 15th the fluctuations had risen to very high levels with the index indicating a fluctuation level of 76.
The fluctuations on mobile were of a similar nature. However, as opposed to desktop, the Rank Risk Index for mobile began tracking elevated fluctuation levels a day earlier, on November 13th. By November 15th the mobile risk level reached 71, indicating that the fluctuations had increased significantly.
Industry chatter also confirms the roll-out of a substantial Google update. On November 15th,
Barry Schwartz of SERoundtable reported that webmasters and SEOs were experiencing noticeable changes in their rankings. Schwartz also speculated that the update does not appear to be related to either Penguin or Panda.
To date, and quite predictably, Google has not commented on the update.
Rank Risk Index - Desktop Version
October 2017
Google ccTLDs No Longer Give Access to International Search Results
Confirmed UpdateOctober 27, 2017
On October 27th, 2017 Google
announced that utilizing a Google country code top-level domain (ccTLD), i.e., google.co.uk, google.ca, etc., will no longer allow users to access international search results. Google indicated that the change comes as part of an effort to deliver more local and thereby relevant results to users. However, the change in ccTLD policy has precipitated a degree of controversy as it has far-reaching implications in regards to international search results.
The Google ccTLD restriction has numerous practical SEO ramifications as user behavior was inherently and universally altered. As such, the traffic and clicks sites received internationally underwent an intrinsic shift, thereby impacting rank itself.
Google's change in the algorithm that allowed it to restrict access to international SEO results and hyper-localize the SERP was picked up by the
Rank Risk Index, which hit risk level of 64 on October 28th.
The update also
impacted SERP features globally, with significant shifts in the frequency of AdWords ads, Local Packs, and Knowledge Panels on the SERP.
Rank Risk Index - Desktop Version
September 2017
A Series of One-day Algorithm Roll-outs
Unconfirmed UpdateSeptember 28, 2017
Throughout the second half of September 2017, the Rank Risk Index caught a series of one-day fluctuation spikes that may constitute a Google algorithm update.
Starting on September the 13th, the index caught four separate one day fluctuation spikes before the month was over. Meaning, that the last three weeks of September each contained at least one significant fluctuation increase, creating a pattern of sorts as each roll-out was a one-day event. In specific, other than the fluctuation caught on the 13th, the index saw fluctuations on September 16th, 20th, and 28th with the fluctuation caught on the 20th being the most significant (as the index reached a risk level of 77).
During each of these fluctuation events, industry chatter also indicated that Google had shifted the rankings. Indeed, the peculiar weekly pattern where one day spikes would occur within a few days of each other was also picked up by the industry. On September 27th, Barry Schwartz of SERoundtable
reported on the beginning of the latest one day fluctuation event by starting off his article with, "Yea, yea, yea
more of the same. Google is updating their search results…” The implication here being that the fluctuations being reported on existed in a larger context, one where Google has made multiple changes to the rankings within a short period of time that could possibly represent one drawn out update.
Rank Risk Index - Desktop Version
June 2017
Elevated Fluctuations Impact Bottom of the SERP Sites
Confirmed UpdateJune 28, 2017
On June 23rd a prolonged series of increased rank fluctuations was initially tracked by the Rank Risk Index. The multi-day spike saw the index hit risk levels as high as 85.
Though initial industry chatter was sparse, the industry began reporting on ranking shifts as the algorithm continued to update. By June 27th,
Barry Schwartz of SERoundtable had seen enough chatter to describe the update as "legit” despite Google all but refusing to confirm the roll-out.
Upon executing a big data analysis, we determined that the most
significant fluctuations were taking place for sites ranked between position 6 and 10 on the SERP. According to our research, while there were increased rank fluctuations occurring within positions 1-5, there was an evident and clearly observable uptick in the fluctuations upon reaching position 6 on the SERP. This data pattern held true across a multitude of niche industries that included Food and Drink, Travel, Retail and Consumer Goods, etc.
Rank Risk Index - Desktop Version
May 2017
Google Update Hits Major Sites
Unconfirmed UpdateMay 23, 2017
On May 18th the Rank Risk index tracked a one day Google rank fluctuation event. Reaching a moderate risk level of 71, the index indicated that Google had released an algorithm update.
At the onset industry chatter was of a limited nature, as indicated by Barry Schwartz of
SERoundtable. As time went on various theories as to what occurred were suggested. One such theory propagated that a test where some URLs corresponding to Featured Snippets were removed from organic results was responsible for the increased fluctuations.
However, our data indicates that this change, while only affecting 4.5% of all Featured Snippets, was not overly impactful and took on a consistent data trajectory that began on May 12th (six days before our index tracked Google's update).
Upon further investigation, our data indicated that
Google had shifted the rankings of some of the most notable Ecommerce sites (i.e. Amazon, Best Buy, Overstock, eBay, etc.). Based on the data available to us, a large part of the rank fluctuations seen on May 18th were a result of Google altering its SERP placement of these notable sites.
Rank Risk Index - Desktop Version
March 2017
Google Link Quality Update - Fred
Confirmed UpdateMarch 09, 2017
On March 8th reports started filtering in that a Google algorithm update was brewing. First reported by
SERoundtable, the initial speculation was that the developing update was related to link quality as black hat SEO forums had shown the most chatter.
As of the 8th our Rank Risk Index on desktop had not shown any abnormal rank fluctuations. However, our index monitoring rank on mobile showed initial signs of an update, displaying moderate rank fluctuations.
On March 9th the Rank Risk Index on desktop showed a significant spike in rank movement as indicated by a risk level of 79. Similarly, our mobile index spiked to a risk level of 77.
Concurrent with the trends on the Rank Risk Index, industry chatter continued to rise. With chatter increasing, the notion of the
update being related to link quality only solidified. As such, Barry Schwartz of SERoundtable reached out to Google for comment. Per usual policy, Google only offered vague comments about constant changes to rank. However, Googler Gary Illyes seemed to imply that indeed an update had occurred, indicating, jokingly, that all such ambiguous updates be called "Fred."
As a result, the industry has adopted the name 'Fred' for the March 9 update.
After the initial rollout, and a three day respite from elevated rank fluctuations, the Rank Risk Index on desktop saw another fluctuation spike. Taking place over two days (March 13 -14), the index recorded a risk level high of 100 on the 14th.
The second phase of ‘Fred’ brought with it what is perhaps clarification as to its nature. Though Google still did not comment on the algorithm,
SearchEngineLand reported that the update targeted sites engaged in over-advertising. That is, sites that engage in excessive advertising to drive revenues while providing poor and inferior content.
Rank Risk Index - Desktop Version
February 2017
Significant Algorithm Update Roll-out
Confirmed UpdateFebruary 07, 2017
From February 7th through the 10th the Rank Risk Index reported heightened levels of rank fluctuations on desktop. This series of increased fluctuations reached a substantial risk level high of 97 on February 9th.
Corresponding to the rank fluctuations on desktop, our mobile index similarly showed an increase in mobile rank fluctuations on February 8th that lasted through the 10th. Like desktop, rank fluctuations reached a high on February 9th hitting a risk level of 90.
At the onset, Barry Schwartz reported this algorithm event on
SERoundtable, indicating that there had been some, though not extensive chatter within the SEO community regarding changes in rank.
As the algorithm continued its roll-out, it became apparent that this was a major ranking event (as indicated by the significantly high fluctuations seen on February 9th as per the Rank Risk Index). With additional reports of rank changes coming in from the SEO community,
SearchEngineLand reported that the update may have been related to the Panda algorithm.
Google has yet to comment on the matter.
Possible Update to Google's Penguin Algorithm
Unconfirmed UpdateFebruary 03, 2017
According to our rank fluctuation index, there was a Google algorithm event that took place between February 1st and 2nd. On both days, the Rank Risk Index for desktop showed heightened, though not excessive, risk levels that reached 69.
The Rank Risk Index monitoring mobile rank fluctuations presented an increase on both days as well. However, on February 2nd the index for mobile showed a slightly more elevated risk level of 70.
SearchEngineLand reported on the algorithm event, indicating that an update may have been made to Google's Penguin algorithm. This theory was supported by an increase in rank change chatter within the "black hat" SEO community, indicating that the update had to do with spammy link practices. This theory was neither confirmed nor denied by Google themselves.
Rank Risk Index - Desktop Version
January 2017
Elevated Fluctuations Point Towards Minor Update
Unconfirmed UpdateJanuary 24, 2017
On January 24th, our Rank Risk Index, monitoring rank fluctuations on desktop, tracked a one day Google algorithm update event. The index indicated that there were significant changes in rank within Google as a risk level of 77 was indicated.
Though a one day event on desktop, our mobile index showed the algorithm event taking place over a three day period (from January 22nd through January 24). The algorithm event culminated with a January 24th risk level of 78, up from 67 on the 23rd, and 69 on the 22nd.
The Google algorithm update event produced increased rank change chatter within the SEO community. Barry Schwartz of
SERoundtable indicated that he believed the update to be of a minor nature, though Google has yet to comment on the update.
Rank Risk Index - Mobile Version
Mobile Penalty
Confirmed UpdateJanuary 11, 2017
Per its August 2016 announcement Google has rolled out its intrusive interstitial penalty on mobile. Released on January 10th, the penalty demotes the rank of mobile sites employing overlays that cover all, or part of, page content.
Per Google’s initial August 23rd announcement, the following interstitial formats are considered intrusive:
- Popups that cover, and as such prevent access to, essential page content.
- Standalone overlays that require a user to dismiss them in order to view essential page content.
- Layouts, wherein which the above-the-fold appears as if it is an interstitial, but where the page content per se is underneath the fold.
While the most common form of intrusive interstitial on mobile are ads, the penalty would penalize other forms of intrusive interstitials as well. To this extent Google has indicated that mobile country and language selectors that take the form of an interstitial are considered intrusive, and sites employing them could be penalized.
The penalty does not apply to all interstitial overlays. Those interstitials that are of a "responsible” nature, such as age verification interstitial overlays, do not fall under the scope of the penalty.
Google has also indicated that should a site be hit by the penalty it will be restored upon reindexing, assuming the intrusive content has been removed.